Should I get a fixed 50-year or some Interest Only mortgage?
Answer:In general, a fixed 50-year loan over Interest Only mortgage is a lot more useful. Why?
A 50-year fixed rate mortgage seems to make no sense - if you are 35 and you buy a house with a 50-year fixed rate loan the loan will be repaid when you turn 85. What is the point of that?
50-Year mortgages help build equity and avoid interest only loans.
For costly areas such as California, a 50-year loan may help avoid an Interest Only loan as payments will be lower compared to a standard 30-year fixed rate mortgage and you will still build equity. 40-year fixed rate loans are gaining popularity in California, anyways.
On the other hand, Interest Only mortgage loans discourage home buyers from building equity even though paying principal is a viable option for IO loans. Also, Option ARMs with their minimum payment option even get you further in debt if not used properly.
A 50-year loan is a great way to acquire a home and build equity in a high cost area. Given that 25% of the new home mortgages in California are 40-year loans it is possible that the 50-year mortgage makes quite a hit.
Link:
Link:
Link: See All 3 National Credit Scores & 3 Reports Instantly, Online & Free
| Not at all | Definitely |
Mortgage QnA is not a common forum. We have special rules:
- Post no questions here. To ask a question, click the Ask a Question link
- We will not publish answers that include any form of advertising
- Add your answer only if it will contrubute to the quality of this Mortgage QnA and help future readers
Common misspellings: mortage and morgage