Should I get a fixed 50-year or some Interest Only mortgage?


In general, a fixed 50-year loan over Interest Only mortgage is a lot more useful. Why?

A 50-year fixed rate mortgage seems to make no sense - if you are 35 and you buy a house with a 50-year fixed rate loan the loan will be repaid when you turn 85. What is the point of that?

50-Year mortgages help build equity and avoid interest only loans.

For costly areas such as California, a 50-year loan may help avoid an Interest Only loan as payments will be lower compared to a standard 30-year fixed rate mortgage and you will still build equity. 40-year fixed rate loans are gaining popularity in California, anyways.

On the other hand, Interest Only mortgage loans discourage home buyers from building equity even though paying principal is a viable option for IO loans. Also, Option ARMs with their minimum payment option even get you further in debt if not used properly.

A 50-year loan is a great way to acquire a home and build equity in a high cost area. Given that 25% of the new home mortgages in California are 40-year loans it is possible that the 50-year mortgage makes quite a hit.

Mortgage rates hit their lowest since 1955. Ask the home loan experts we recommend Quicken Loans how to take advantage of them.
Was this Mortgage QnA helpful?
Not at all
  • Currently 2.9/5 Stars
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Add to this Answer

Mortgage QnA is not a common forum. We have special rules:

  • Post no questions here. To ask a question, click the Ask a Question link
  • We will not publish answers that include any form of advertising
  • Add your answer only if it will contrubute to the quality of this Mortgage QnA and help future readers
If you have trouble reading the code, click on the code itself to generate a new random code. Verification Code Above:
Bookmark and share this QnA: